The Left is Starting to See Their Mistakes! (Should we worry?)

Join us as we delve deep into an analysis of a leftist article to understand the core reasons behind the left's failing strategies and potential recovery methods. We'll explore the shifts in public opinion, impactful cultural issues, and the role of bad actors in the trans movement. Discover insights on how leftist activists can reconnect with mainstream public sentiment and navigate the complexities of modern advocacy.

Malcolm Collins: Hello Simone. I am excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be analyzing a piece that was written by Leftists and I think is the closest to understanding why they are actually failing and how they can reverse course. Ooh. Which is in a way concerning for me for a long time fighting the left.

It feels a bit like fighting the in Star Trek,

Basically every communist revolution ever.

Speaker: Hi, I'm King Packled

Speaker 2: It is an honor to meet you, sir.

Speaker 3: I'm emperor of the packs.

Speaker 4: Okay,

Speaker 5: the big helmets. Were no longer controller.

I'm now park leader. Be.

Malcolm Collins: where it's this race. It is. manevelent, but it is also tremendously stupid and ugly. Oh, okay. And so, like, they're, they're just like lumbering idiots, and they keep making mistakes and they're like, I bet it's because men are misogynist, that Kamala didn't win.

There's been a recent one that I might even wanna analyze if people want me to go deeper into it. There's like a big leftist analysis of how Trump manipulated results working with like Teal and Elon. And it's very much like a mirrored version of the right wing thing.

Wow. How

interesting. And I, I found it interesting because the way that they argued felt very much like the, the first time around, right?

It was almost like they studied, or they were even part of that first time around phenomenon, and now they're on the other side, whoever, whoever was doing this because they clearly had practice. So that'd be interesting to go into. But this one, it was from an article in The Guardian. You know, our personal PR team no, nobody gives us more free press than they do.

Getting guardian reporters to come to our house and report on us. There's been like 12 pieces this year, by the way. , Often feels a bit like this scene was the pcakled

Speaker 6: we are pack led. We are honest traitors. Oh, we need information. Oh, I, I, I don't know anything. You are pack led? Yes, we are pack led. Oh, then you have knowledge. You are not stupid. Well, no, we are not stupid. Then you will beam over and tell us what we need to know.

Oh no, though I'm afraid I will not be. Over why you are clinging on. We are pack lit. I do not understand you it is difficult to understand.

Well then you must come aboard our ship and explain why you are afraid to come aboard. Yes, I will do that. I will beam over and explain. , You are a good negotiator captain. Yes, but we are pack led.

Malcolm Collins: They really hate us by the way, but they, they're good at pumping out pieces on us, and they, they're, they're actually the least accurate of all the news sources that write on us. I, like, I've never seen any other news source make as many factual errors as the Guardian does. And I'm including tabloids here which has really surprising me.

But again, like a lot of old good newspapers like Vice and the NF, Alans vr, you know, Kirsha thing. Mm-hmm. Like, people would be like, what Vice is like the number one mistake publication on you? And Kirsha would be like, yeah. Like, they just make stuff up. You know, and so, it's interesting that publications that really stick to journalistic integrity one that has by the way, is the, the New York Times.

They're very diligent in, in checking things whenever they do a piece on us, but. To this instead of some insider baseball here. Let's go over this piece. We're gonna cut into like midway through it, it's called, how does the Woke Stark winning? Again, British progressives have suffered major setbacks in recent years, in both public opinion and court rulings.

Was the backlash inevitable and are new tactics needed by Gabby Siff? And I just hope that nobody hires this woman to do any strategy for the you know, the Labor Party or the Dems, right? That that'd be a little worrying to me. Or, or sorry, in the uk. She would probably be helping the Conservative Party because they're so woke.

But anyway, anyway, anyway, a joke there. The to, robert went Mute is a professor of human rights law at King's College London, a gay man who worked for decades on anti-discrimination test cases and helped draft the so-called yata principles, a founding statement of the campaign for self-identification, or the right for trans people to gain legal recognition in their preferred sexual orientation or gender identity without requiring a doctor's diagnosis of gender dysphoria.

In a 2005 book, he argued that LGB people had a moral duty to speak out for the T. His new book, transgender Rights Verse, women's Rights from Conflicts to Coexistence explains why he changed his mind. So what I find really interesting here, and I think that this is what Wokes should have been doing mm-hmm.

Is exploring why people who used to be on their team, or it used to be like Unmitigated Lee on their team, switched their beliefs. You know, I see a lot of people, you know, they'll look at like JK Rowling and they'll be like, okay, she went transphobic, right. And it's like, but like. I have never seen a leftist really deeply try to understand what changed her mind in this area.

Yeah. It's clear she's not a conservative Christian and she certainly didn't have any alliance, was the old conservative movement, like why did she change her position on the, the, the, from one of, of, of unmitigated trans support to trans skepticism and. With Elon, it's less of a question for people.

A lot of people like this is a personal beef with his kid. And I think that that's part of it. But the question is, is why did he even begin to start that personal beef with his kid, right? Mm-hmm. Like, or you can look at individuals like us who have gone to the right, right? Like we used to be leftists.

Right? Right. Solidly leftists. And now I consider myself solidly a rightist on, on almost every issue. Like we're not even, you know, toe dippy about this stuff at this point. Right. And, and a lot of people would be like, well, you, you're not like racist or antisemitic or like, yeah, that's not the right, okay.

You don't like hate gay people. It's like, that's not the right, you know, I've, I, I've done a lot of episodes supporting the right for different cultures who'll have different perceptions of things like this. And I think that that's all we can really hope to win as the right, right now, you know, fight.

Absolutely. To not have like Mormons canceled because they hold Mormon beliefs. Yeah. We're,

Simone Collins: we're just fighting for cultural sovereignty, which is so different from what. We grew up thinking the right was about

Malcolm Collins: well, because the right wasn't about that when we grew up, they had enough power to enforce their cultural

Simone Collins: Yeah.

It, it, it, at the time was the party of cultural imperialism. And now that has inverted,

Malcolm Collins: they, they, they had enough power to enforce their beliefs on the general population through voting. And now the urban monoculture is the core cultural force. So the people who are resistant to it, which was mostly weirdos like us and religious conservatives and people who just wanna be able to live their lives